The Only Solution

“I don’t think you’d have to kill -- assassinate -- too many [vivisectors] ... I think for 5 lives, 10 lives, 15 human lives, we could save a million, 2 million, 10 million non-human lives.”

I wish that I could take credit for the above quote and I am sure that Harry Davis would not even think twice about attributing it to me the next time he makes one of his calls to CSIS!  The reality, however, is that while this is probably my favorite quote in regards to the fight for animal rights it is a quote from a speech given by the great Dr. Jerry Vlasak, a man who is not done justice by calling him simply a legend in the animal rights movement.  While other giants in the animal rights movement such as Stephen Best write extensively Dr. Vlasak has been on the front lines of the fight for animal rights and has been persecuted and attacked for his sacrifice.

The use of violence in the fight for animal rights is one of the most hotly debated topics amongst not only those who are involved in the fight for animal rights but among the general public as well.  Within the animal rights movement there is a highly misguided dedication to pacifism by many activists.  Those who advocate non-violence exclusively often explain their opposition to violence by claiming they do not want to sink to the level of the opponents and believe that educating the general public is a more effective strategy.  Unfortunately the animal rights movement has been using these tactics for over 40 years now with precious little to show for it.  Those who exploit and abuse animals see these tactics as nothing but a minor annoyance and they simply laugh off those activists who protest peacefully or sign petitions.  In short they take peaceful protests as evidence of weakness.  They go on exploiting and torturing animals because there are no real consequences for their actions.  While vivisectors will wail at length about how they need to operate behind locked doors in secrecy because their very lives are in danger from animal rights activists they are only too aware that this is simply a propaganda tactic to allow them to torture and kill more animals.  Law enforcement is only too willing to shill for these disgusting excuses for humanity by making outrageous claims such as the one made by the Federal Bureau of Intimidation to the United States Congress that animal rights activists were the number 1 domestic terrorist threat in North America today.  Both the vivisectors and law enforcement know that this is anything but true but it serves each one's purpose to make these outrageous statements.  For law enforcement it works to allow them to get more tax dollars to fight "animal rights extremists"  and for the vivisectors it allows them to continue to operate in secrecy.  Of course when they are asked for evidence of the great danger that supposedly exists they can't provide it because it simply does not exist.  If their lives were in danger the way they claim there would be scores of dead vivisectors (this would be wonderful if it was true).  In reality there has never been a vivisector killed or even seriously injured by animal rights activists.  The closest one of these pieces of garbage ever came to being killed happened many years ago when Brian Cass of HLS was attacked as he walked to his car.  Unfortunately he was not killed and walked away with only a few stitches.  It is time to start making the claims of vivisector's lives being in danger a reality.

Dr. Vlasak is quite right when he says that there would not need to be too many of these worthless excuses for humanity killed in order to save the lives of millions of animals.  It is virtually a guarantee that once 2 or 3 or them were killed there would be a mass exodus of "researchers" because while they like to pretend their lives are in danger and portray themselves as selfless human beings who put their lives on the line each day to try and make things better for mankind the reality is that they are sadistic cowards who will run at the first sign of real danger.  If they had to legitimately wonder every time they turned the key in the ignition of their car if it was going to be the time they were blown into a million pieces they would soon find a new career.  Likewise if they had to legitimately wonder when the phone call would come to tell them that their spouse or children had been kidnapped or killed it would not be long until the thrill of torturing and killing animals would be long gone.  There will be those who are legitimately horrified at the very idea that the families of these sadistic killers could be targeted but they would be perfectly legitimate targets.  Unlike the families of serial killers or other criminals the families of vivisectors know exactly what the vivisector does and they willingly accept the benefits that the blood money these pieces of garbage bring home.Vivisectors show no concern or mercy towards the animals they torture and kill on a daily basis so they are not worthy of any mercy.

While not all activists are able to engage in violence against vivisectors those who do resort to violence need to be supported and revered for the heros that they are.
 

Why would the piece of filth that did this to this poor creature deserve any sympathy or mercy?